User Tools

Site Tools


api4kb_rules

====== Differences ====== This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
api4kb_rules [2012/10/01 15:42]
rmbell created
api4kb_rules [2012/10/22 05:13]
apaschke
Line 1: Line 1:
 APIs for Rule Engines [[start|Link to API4KB Main Page]] APIs for Rule Engines [[start|Link to API4KB Main Page]]
-   * Need to identify a target set of rule languages+   * Need to identify a target set of rule languages ​and rule types (derivation,​ reaction (production,​ ECA, CEP)
    * Need to determine whether support for machine learning, planning, etc. is in scope long term    * Need to determine whether support for machine learning, planning, etc. is in scope long term
-   ​* ​For specific rule languages, ​support for RIF family at minimum +   ​* ​Need support for a general rule language interchange (RuleML as general rule interchange language and RIF as specialized Web rule interchange format) 
-      * Load vocabularies +      * Translate and Load vocabularies 
-      * Execute rules+      * Execute rules (transformations from the platform-independent interchange format into the platform-specific executable rule language) 
 +      * Interchange of queries and answers (at a minimum)  
 +      * Interchange of rule sets / rule bases 
 +      * Interchange of proofs 
 +      * Interchange of test cases for verification and validation 
 +Need to see how this connects with the work that is going on for PRR and Decision Management at %%OMG%%
  
-Need to see how this connects with the work that is going on for PRR and Decision Management ​at OMG+    * Need support for a rule interface description for distributed rule bases (see RuleML) 
 +      * description of supported semantics 
 +      * description of public signatures which can be queried (derivation rules) or triggered (reaction rules) including  
 +      * description of life cycle management (e.g. descriptive metadata and qualifying metadata, e.g. validity of the rules, rule management in KB etc.) 
 +    * Need to support rule inference services (looseley-coupled or de-coupled 
 +      * wrap rule inference services into agents (see e.g. RuleResponder) 
 +        * agent role models 
 +        * pragmatic primitives for coordination and negotiation (e.g. FIPA ACL primitives) 
 +      * description of non-functional properties of the rule service 
 +    * Need support for validation, verification and integrity (VVI) testing 
 +      * Verification ensures the logical correctness of a rule base 
 +      * Validation ​is concerned with the correctness of a rule-based system in a certain domain or application (e.g. a derived discount of 10% and 5% might be mutual exclusive or might add up depending ​on the domain/​application) 
 +      * Integrity (constraints) are a way to formulate consistency (or inconsistency) criteria 
 +      * Uses Test Cases for VVI (see RuleML test cases for VVI) 
 +        * Test Cases can be used for testing ​at design time (test-driven development) and run time (e.g. rule translation and compliance test cases) 
 +        * Test cases can be interchanged together with rules and  
 +          * used to validate the interchanged rule set in the target system/​environment. 
 +          * Newly received rules can be safely added to an existing rule set, if they pass all existing test cases. 
 +          * Test cases can be predefined by experts while rules are written or combined by “normal” practitioners. The test cases then safeguard this latter authoring process. 
 +          * Test cases are less abstract than the general purpose rules and therefore easier to comprehend for the end user. 
  
 +
 +
 +===== Questions =====
 +   * Enter questions here
api4kb_rules.txt · Last modified: 2012/12/09 15:18 by apaschke