User Tools

Site Tools


api4kb_reasoning

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
api4kb_reasoning [2013/03/17 18:53]
admin
api4kb_reasoning [2013/03/17 19:07] (current)
admin
Line 19: Line 19:
       * e.g., DL, DL approximation (such as TrOWL), various OWL profiles, OWL “Full” with punning, RDF entailment       * e.g., DL, DL approximation (such as TrOWL), various OWL profiles, OWL “Full” with punning, RDF entailment
       * semantic profiles e.g. different entailment regimes       * semantic profiles e.g. different entailment regimes
 +
 +
 +So, looking at the requirements:​ we would like to build a KB
 +incrementally,​ check its consistency and either confirm or undo some of
 +the changes. I don't see anything that
 +mandates the transactional approach. The consistency check should not be
 +a problem:
 +
 +***** CheckConsistency(
 +    in URL knowledgeBase
 +    out boolean isKBConsistent );
 +REST mapping : POST
 +
 +(Apparently trivial API, but we should define what "​consistent"​ means in
 +the general case vs pure ontology KBs)
  
 ===== Questions ===== ===== Questions =====
    * Enter questions here    * Enter questions here
api4kb_reasoning.txt · Last modified: 2013/03/17 19:07 by admin